Summary Questions – Kant/Regan
Put things in your own words unless the question asks for a direct quote. Answer each question in 8-12 sentences.
For required quotes, use the original assigned Kant and Regan readings, not the editors introductions in our course text, the course videos/notes, or any other sources. For Kant, the assigned part of the original reading starts with the paragraph near the middle of Chapter 8 that reads If we have hitherto drawn our notion Do not quote from the first half of Chapter 8, since we are not reading that part. For Regan, the original reading starts on the page of Chapter 26 that reads I regard myself as an advocate
1. Describe Kants first form of the categorical imperative. Then, use it to assess an example action from a book, movie, or tv show as moral or immoral. Identify the maxim of the person performing the action you have chosen and consider whether or not it can be reasonably willed as a universal law. Put things in your own words, since the question does not ask for a direct quote.
2. Describe Kants second form of the categorical imperative, including his distinction between treating someone as an end and using someone as a means only. Then, use these concepts to assess the ethics of the same action you chose above. As part of your answer, give a quote from the reading, using quotation marks and the in-text citation (Kant, 1785/2010, section 2, para. ____). The last several paragraphs of the reading are where he discusses the second form of the categorical imperative, so look there for details to bring in.
3. What is one objection or criticism that might be raised against Regans account of animal rights? Do you find this objection compelling, and if so, why? Or, do you think Regan can defend his view against the objection, and if so, how might he do this? In either case, include and explain a quote from Regan as part of your answer, using quotation marks and the in-text citation
