Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

Walden University Countering Stereotype Threat – Doll Study PT1 Paper

Walden University Countering Stereotype Threat – Doll Study PT1 Paper

Walden University Countering Stereotype Threat – Doll Study PT1 Paper
Question Description
Countering Stereotype Threat
In the summer of 1992, Mattel’s Teen Talk Barbie came under fire for one of her 270 phrases, famously, “Math class is tough!” Research indicates that girls are in fact influenced by stereotypes early in their educational lives (Steele, 2003). Often, simply knowing that a group is expected to perform less well in a domain will increase the likelihood of poorer performance. Whether they be academic performance or choices on a doll test, the consequences of such covert and subtle forms of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination take a cumulative, life-draining toll on their targets. This week’s media resource gives you a clear illustration of the impact of stereotype threat
For this essay, please follow the instructions as below:
1. Explain the concept of stereotype threat. (200 words)
2. Watch the course video Doll Study PT1, and describe the stereotype threat present in the video. (200 words)
3. Explain how stereotype threat may impacted group identity and/or performance. (450 words)
4. Explain two strategies to counter that stereotype threat. (400 words)
Support your essay with specific references. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.
Reference: Steele, J. (2003). Children’s gender stereotypes about math: The role of stereotype stratification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(12), 2587–2606.
Required Resources
Readings
Alter, A. L., Aronson, J., Darley, J. M., Rodriguez, C., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Rising to the threat: Reducing stereotype threat by framing the threat as a challenge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 166–171.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. K. (1939). The development of consciousness of self and the emergence of racial identification in Negro preschool children. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 591–599.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Mrazek, M. D., Chin, J. M., Schmader, T., Hartson, K. A., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Threatened to distraction: Mind-wandering as a consequence of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1243–1248.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949–966.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Media
Inside The AC360 Doll Study PT1. (2010). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cWgV5sigbQ.

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”
Attachments
20190401155948stereotype_threat_and_the_evaluative_context_of_communication_ (523 kB)
20190401155949seeking_congruity_between_goals_and_roles__a_new_look_at_why_women_opt_out_of_science__technology__engineering__and_mathematics_careers._ (342 kB)
20190401155949the_development_of_consciousness_of_self_and_the_emergence_of_racial_identification_in_negro_preschool_children._ (379 kB)
20190401155955threatened_to_distraction__mind_wandering_as_a_consequence_of_stereotype_threat. (332 kB)

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Homework Discussion only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Homework Discussion are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Homework Discussion is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Homework Discussion, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.