The file attached below contains the requirements, do as listed. The link to the debate is:
http://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/abolish-death-penalty (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
You are on wendy and john’s side and will talk about ONLY one of the two.
The essay is on the file below, you will be writing a completely new essay and the essay below is only so you know what NOT to do. Follow the instructors comment below:
“One panelist and only one panelist should have been the focus of the entire essay. If you chose Wendy Kaminer then you should not have included John McWhorter. If you chose John McWhoter for the focus of the essay, then you should not have included Wendy Kaminer. In the introduction, you should have summarized one panelist and only one panelist, and you should have ended your introduction with your one sentence conclusion statementyour overall reason or reasons why you believe this panelist’s argument didn’t work. In the body paragraphs (for each body paragraph), you should first summarize a specific premise from the panelist’s argument, explain the premise, and then critique it. When you critique each premise, you should consider the type of argument panelist usedargument by generalization, analogy, authority and causationand the rules associated with each rule. You should reread the sample essay, explanation of assignment, document on structure of assignment, and all other material for essay.”
