MGMT203 ERAU Management for Aeronautical Science Crew Resource Management Video Analysis
Question Description
Here are the instructions for this assignment:
The video linked below provides a reviewof different CRM accidents, SHEL model, crew communication, andprocesses. Approximately 80 percent of all accidents are related tohuman factors (FAA, 2016, p.2. 2).
Crew Resource Management CRM (YouTube – 13:10) (Links to an external site.)
Please number and state each question/statement and write a separate paragraph or paragraphs for each answer.
A brief introduction of human factors.
Summarize different problems or failures related to human factors.You may use accident reports, videos, and research documents located inHunt Library.
Since you have just been promoted to management, what actions canyou take to prevent human factors incidents and accidents? Pleaseconsider the management functions: planning, organizing, staffing,leading, and controlling.
Assignment Criteria
Include a Cover Page
Cover page includes your name, date, Course #, and Module Assignment #, Title.
Give each answer in its separate paragraph(s).
500 words minimum, not including References or Cover Page
The paper should be grammatically sound and free of spelling errors.
Citations and references must be in current APA format.
Double Spaced
A minimum of 3 references, in the Reference section at the end of the paper, is required.
Two references must be scholarly, peer-reviewed, and from reputable sources.
One textbook reference is acceptable.
This paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin. This is a
service that checks your work for improper citation or potential
plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student
papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that
your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any
material!
Review the Assignment Rubric for detailed grading criteria.
The following is the grading rubic:
MGMT 203 6.3 Assignment Rubric
MGMT 203 6.3 Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstration of Knowledge and Comprehension of Assigned Reading(s)
25.0 pts(Excellent – A) Posts clearly indicate that readings were understood and concepts incorporated well into responses.
23.0pts(Above-Average – B) Posts indicate readings were understood and incorporated into responses.
21.0pts(Average – C) Posts have questionable relationship to reading material.
19.0pts(Near-Failing – D) Posts do not indicate that readings were understood and/or not incorporated into discussion.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimely Discussion Contributions
20.0pts(Excellent- A) All required posts submitted. Replies to several colleagues’discussions points submitted. Posts are well distributed throughout theweek.
18.0pts(Above-Average- B) All required posts submitted. Replies to few colleagues’discussions points submitted. Posts are distributed throughout the week.
16.0pts(Average- C) All required posts submitted. Replies to several colleagues’discussions points not submitted. Postings are not distributedthroughout the week.
14.0pts(Near-Failing- D) All required posts not submitted. Replies to several colleagues’discussions points not submitted. Postings are not distributedthroughout the week.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Postings
20.0pts(Excellent – A) Posts reflect the readings and outside information with proper outside source material citation.
18.0pts(Above-Average – B) Posts reflect the reading and some outside source material but outside source material not cited.
16.0pts(Average – C) Posts reflect some understanding of the reading.
14.0pts(Near-Failing – D) Posts are not relevant to the questions posed.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Reply
20.0pts(Excellent – A) Response relevant to posting and supports position with factual information.
18.0pts(Above-Average – B) Response relevant to posting but fails to support position.
16.0pts(Average – C) Response somewhat relevant to posting but fails to support position.
14.0pts(Near-Failing – D) Response not relevant to original posting.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdherence to Online Protocols
15.0pts(Excellent – A) ERAU on-line protocols followed.
12.0pts(Above-Average – B) ERAU on-line protocols followed.
10.0pts(Average – C) ERAU on-line protocols followed.
8.0pts(Near-Failing – D) ERAU on-line protocols violated.
Total Points:100.0

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”