MGT300 Colorado State Tesla Motors Regional Manager in California Report
Question Description
Module 4: Portfolio Milestone
Points75
Submittinga file upload
Portfolio Milestone (75 Points)
Options #1 & #2: Interview Subject, Summary of Theories, and Outline
Review the Portfolio Project Descriptions and the Portfolio Projectgrading rubric, which can be accessed from the Module 8 folder. ThePortfolio Project will be due at the end of the course before midnightof Week 8.
This week, select which of the two Portfolio Project options you willcomplete. Before midnight on Sunday, submit the name of the person whowill be your interview subject and a summary of the theories that youplan to cover, along with an outline of your Portfolio Project, to thedrop box link in this assignment. Your outline should include bulletpoints in the form of sentences or phrases describing each majorargument you want to make, and organized as the final project will beorganized. Your approach to theory can change as you progress throughthe Portfolio Project, so the information you provide this week is notset in stone. Although this document is by no means a complete or finaldocument, it should be sufficiently advanced to serve as a guide for aworking draft of your project that serves to ensure that your writing isclear, thoughtful, and precise.
Your submission should be 250-500 words in length.
Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. TheLibrary Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within thelibrary that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
MGT300 Mod 4 PM
MGT300 Mod 4 PM
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
35.0to >28.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Thesubmission includes the name of the person who will be your interviewsubject, a summary of the theories that you plan to cover, along with anoutline of your Portfolio Project. The submission includes all of therequired components as specified in the assignment and is 250-500 wordsin length.
28.0to >21.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
21.0to >14.0 ptsBelow Expectation
The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
14.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Demonstratesstrong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly representsknowledge from the readings and sources, references key concepts within-text citations to support answers.
8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Providesstrong or adequate thought, insight and analysis into a summary oftheories and logical organization of the project portfolio detailed inthe outline.
8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.
6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.
4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Projectis clearly organized, well written, and in the proper format asoutlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and outline structure; fewerrors in grammar and spelling.
8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Projectis fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format asoutlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and outlinestructure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Projectis poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistentto inadequate sentence and outline development; numerous errors ingrammar and spelling.
4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Outlineis not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poorquality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Projectcontains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide toWriting and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Fewerrors in APA formatting, according to the