Assessment 1 Information
Subject Code: MBA603
Subject Name: New Venture Capital Raising
Assessment Title: Risks and Ethical Issues
Assessment Type: Report
Choose an item.: 1500 Words (+/-10%)
Weighting: 25 %
Total Marks: 100
Submission: via Turnitin
Due Date: Week 4
Your Task
The purpose of Assessment 1 is to identify and discuss the various risks and ethical issues to be considered when launching as well as investing in a start-up.
Assessment Description
Learning Outcome 3: Evaluate the ethical environment associated with the funding of new ventures.
Assessment Instructions In the first two parts, discuss the various risks and ethical issues to consider (1) as an entrepreneur when launching a start-up and (2) as an investor when investing in a start-up. Then (Part 3), identify those risks and ethical issues that you think are the top three (inclusive) you need to give priority to when launching / investing in a start-up. Give examples using various case studies / businesses (including your own business). Justify your answers giving reference to relevant research. Here are some basic guidelines for the submission:
Introduction: Give a brief background of what the paper will be about and highlight any companies that will serve as case studies.
Risks / Risk Assessments o Highlight at least three (3) risks to be considered when launching or investing in a start-up. o Consider the different viewpoints from an entrepreneurs perspective and an investors
perspective.
Ethical Issues o Highlight at least three (3) ethical issues to be considered when launching or investing in a
start-up. o Consider the different viewpoints from an entrepreneurs perspective and an investors
perspective.
Top Three Risks / Ethical Issues (inclusive) o From the 6+ issues you have identified in the previous sections (inclusively), identify
and discuss the top three issues and how you would mitigate the risk.
Conclusion / Summary
References Use a minimum of three (3) real business case studies / scenarios for this report. Additionally, a minimum of ten (10) professional / academic references (journals, reputable websites, government papers, etc.) are to be used.
Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment Marking Guide
Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85%-100%
Mark
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS
Introduction Introduction was not included. Introduction was vague. Introduction covered basic background and overview paper.
Very good introduction with clear background and overview of the paper.
Excellent introduction with clear and thorough overview of what the report will cover.
/ 10
Identification and evaluation of risks
Very vague identification and evaluation of risks. No case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Vague identification and evaluation of risks. Case studies / businesses were either not relevant and/or highlighted.
Satisfactory identification and evaluation of risks. Acceptable case studies / businesses highlighted.
Very good identification and evaluation of risks. Very good case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Excellent identification and evaluation of risks. Excellent case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
/ 30
Identification and discussion of ethical issues
Very vague identification and evaluation of ethical issues. No case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Ethical issues identified and evaluated but needed much more depth. Limited case studies / businesses highlighted.
Satisfactory identification and evaluation of ethical issues. Acceptable case studies / businesses highlighted.
Very good identification and evaluation of ethical issues. Very good case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Excellent identification and evaluation of ethical issues. Excellent case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
/ 30
Recommendations / Conclusions / Summary
Recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions were not addressed / included.
Recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions were included but vague.
Recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions were sufficiently addressed.
Very good recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions though could have been clearer.
Excellent and thorough recommendations (top three) and conclusions including how to mitigate the risks.
/ 10
Structure Format and Presentation (Consistent across all courses) OUT OF 20 MARKS
Answer clearly and logically presented
Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure
Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure
Writing style is mostly clear; Generally logical flow and structure
Answer presented mostly clear and logical
Answer presented very clear and logical.
/ 4
Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed
Inappropriate and outdated theory and research used
Adequate theory and research used; Some research dated. Met minimum standards,
Good theory and research used. Current. Could have had more in-depth research.
Very good and in-depth theory and research used; current and thorough.
Excellent and current theory and research used; Depth of research exceeded expectations
/ 4
Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation
Non-academic writing style, lacks clarity and has no flow. No structure. Many spelling and grammatical errors.
Writing style is non-academic though is clear; minor flow and structure issues. Spelling/ grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is clear; good flow, some structure issues. Some spelling or grammatical errors.
Clear academic writing style with very good flow and structure. Minor spelling or grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is very clear with sound flow and structure. No spelling or grammatical errors.
/ 4
Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines
Format of answer does not follow KBS guidelines of the question requirements
Format of answer adequately meets question requirements; KBS guidelines inconsistent
Format of answer meets question requirements and KBS guidelines; some errors
Format of answer consistent with question requirements & KBS guidelines; a couple of errors
Format of answer exceeds question requirements and KBS guidelines; no errors
/ 4
In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines
None or very few sources are acknowledged. Does not follow Harvard style nor KBS guidelines. (0)
Acknowledged few sources in text and reference list. Few citations and references follow Harvard style. KBS guidelines rarely adhered to. (1)
Acknowledged some sources in text and reference list. Inconsistent use of Harvard style. Some KBS guidelines adhered to. (2)
Acknowledged most sources in text and reference list. Most citations and references follow Harvard style. Most KBS guidelines adhered to. (3)
Acknowledged all sources in text and reference list. All citations and references follow Harvard style. All KBS guidelines adhered to. (4)
/ 4
Comments:
/10
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Blog
Archive
Essay
Reviews
Contact
google+twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.comHOMEWORKMARKET.COM YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERSHomeworkMarket
Home.Homework Answers.
Help.
Log in / Sign up
Assignment 1
profile
dee5758
MBA603T1_2020_Assessment1_v1.pdf
Home>Architecture and Design homework help>Assignment 1
Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment 1 Information
Subject Code: MBA603
Subject Name: New Venture Capital Raising
Assessment Title: Risks and Ethical Issues
Assessment Type: Report
Choose an item.: 1500 Words (+/-10%)
Weighting: 25 %
Total Marks: 100
Submission: via Turnitin
Due Date: Week 4
Your Task
The purpose of Assessment 1 is to identify and discuss the various risks and ethical issues to be considered when launching as well as investing in a start-up.
Assessment Description
Learning Outcome 3: Evaluate the ethical environment associated with the funding of new ventures.
Assessment Instructions In the first two parts, discuss the various risks and ethical issues to consider (1) as an entrepreneur when launching a start-up and (2) as an investor when investing in a start-up. Then (Part 3), identify those risks and ethical issues that you think are the top three (inclusive) you need to give priority to when launching / investing in a start-up. Give examples using various case studies / businesses (including your own business). Justify your answers giving reference to relevant research. Here are some basic guidelines for the submission:
Introduction: Give a brief background of what the paper will be about and highlight any companies that will serve as case studies.
Risks / Risk Assessments o Highlight at least three (3) risks to be considered when launching or investing in a start-up. o Consider the different viewpoints from an entrepreneurs perspective and an investors
perspective.
Ethical Issues o Highlight at least three (3) ethical issues to be considered when launching or investing in a
start-up. o Consider the different viewpoints from an entrepreneurs perspective and an investors
perspective.
Top Three Risks / Ethical Issues (inclusive) o From the 6+ issues you have identified in the previous sections (inclusively), identify
and discuss the top three issues and how you would mitigate the risk.
Conclusion / Summary
References Use a minimum of three (3) real business case studies / scenarios for this report. Additionally, a minimum of ten (10) professional / academic references (journals, reputable websites, government papers, etc.) are to be used.
Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment Marking Guide
Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85%-100%
Mark
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS
Introduction Introduction was not included. Introduction was vague. Introduction covered basic background and overview paper.
Very good introduction with clear background and overview of the paper.
Excellent introduction with clear and thorough overview of what the report will cover.
/ 10
Identification and evaluation of risks
Very vague identification and evaluation of risks. No case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Vague identification and evaluation of risks. Case studies / businesses were either not relevant and/or highlighted.
Satisfactory identification and evaluation of risks. Acceptable case studies / businesses highlighted.
Very good identification and evaluation of risks. Very good case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Excellent identification and evaluation of risks. Excellent case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
/ 30
Identification and discussion of ethical issues
Very vague identification and evaluation of ethical issues. No case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Ethical issues identified and evaluated but needed much more depth. Limited case studies / businesses highlighted.
Satisfactory identification and evaluation of ethical issues. Acceptable case studies / businesses highlighted.
Very good identification and evaluation of ethical issues. Very good case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
Excellent identification and evaluation of ethical issues. Excellent case studies / relevant businesses highlighted.
/ 30
Recommendations / Conclusions / Summary
Recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions were not addressed / included.
Recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions were included but vague.
Recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions were sufficiently addressed.
Very good recommendations (top three) with mitigation and conclusions though could have been clearer.
Excellent and thorough recommendations (top three) and conclusions including how to mitigate the risks.
/ 10
Structure Format and Presentation (Consistent across all courses) OUT OF 20 MARKS
Answer clearly and logically presented
Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure
Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure
Writing style is mostly clear; Generally logical flow and structure
Answer presented mostly clear and logical
Answer presented very clear and logical.
/ 4
Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed
Inappropriate and outdated theory and research used
Adequate theory and research used; Some research dated. Met minimum standards,
Good theory and research used. Current. Could have had more in-depth research.
Very good and in-depth theory and research used; current and thorough.
Excellent and current theory and research used; Depth of research exceeded expectations
/ 4
Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation
Non-academic writing style, lacks clarity and has no flow. No structure. Many spelling and grammatical errors.
Writing style is non-academic though is clear; minor flow and structure issues. Spelling/ grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is clear; good flow, some structure issues. Some spelling or grammatical errors.
Clear academic writing style with very good flow and structure. Minor spelling or grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is very clear with sound flow and structure. No spelling or grammatical errors.
/ 4
Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines
Format of answer does not follow KBS guidelines of the question requirements
Format of answer adequately meets question requirements; KBS guidelines inconsistent
Format of answer meets question requirements and KBS guidelines; some errors
Format of answer consistent with question requirements & KBS guidelines; a couple of errors
Format of answer exceeds question requirements and KBS guidelines; no errors
/ 4
In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines
None or very few sources are acknowledged. Does not follow Harvard style nor KBS guidelines. (0)
Acknowledged few sources in text and reference list. Few citations and references follow Harvard style. KBS guidelines rarely adhered to. (1)
Acknowledged some sources in text and reference list. Inconsistent use of Harvard style. Some KBS guidelines adhered to. (2)
Acknowledged most sources in text and reference list. Most citations and references follow Harvard style. Most KBS guidelines adhered to. (3)
Acknowledged all sources in text and reference list. All citations and references follow Harvard style. All KBS guidelines adhered to. (4)
/ 4
Comments:
/10
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Blog
Archive
Essay
Reviews
Contact
google+twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com
