Unit 5 Assignment – Eurocurrency Market
Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 5 Points: 100 Overview: This will continue your investigation of the European Union and the trends in the Eurocurrency market. Instructions: After watching the video, Euro Doomed? Bloomberg QuickTakes, do some research on your own from reliable sources and address specific questions:
What was the reasoning behind the creation of such union and the of the Euro currency?
Please explain your perspective with facts from your research. What are some of the dangers for the global economy associated with the
Brexit? Requirements:
Minimum of two pages in length, excluding the Title and Reference page. APA format, including an in-text citation for referenced works. At least three resources. In this course, only one late submission will be accepted per term with no penalty
as long as the assignment is submitted within one week of the due date. It is the students’ responsibility to inform the instructor of a late submission. Please reference the assignment guidelines and rubric.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.
IBA301 Principles of International Business
Unit 5 Assignment – Eurocurrency Market
Evaluation Rubric for Eurocurrency Market Assignment
CRITERIA Deficient Development Needed
Proficient Exemplary
(0-29 points) (30-39 points) (40-49 points) (50 points)
Content
Written work does not cover the assigned
topic; assertions are not supported by
evidence; paper is seriously lacking in content and detail.
Written work does not do an adequate job of
covering the assigned topic; assertions are
weakly supported by
evidence.
Written work is sufficient to cover
the topic; assertions are supported by
evidence.
Written work provides in-depth coverage of the
topics, assertions are
clearly supported by evidence.
(0-5 points) (6-7 points) (8-9 points) (10 points)
Resources Scholarly journals
were not used or used properly.
Less than 3 scholarly
journals were used.
3 scholarly journals were
used.
3 or more scholarly
journals were used.
(0-5 points) (6-7 points) (8-9 points) (10 points)
Paper Length Paper is not meeting requirements.
Paper is inadequate in meeting the page and
content area requirements.
Does not meet the full required
number of pages/length and
content areas.
Paper meets the required length of pages and content areas.
(0-5 points) (6-7 points) (8-9 points) (10 points)
Mechanics
Written work had serious and persistent
errors in word selection and use.
Sentence structure, spelling, grammar, punctuation was
inappropriate and with serious errors.
APA style was
completely unacceptable.
Written work had serious and
persistent errors in word selection
and use;
Sentence structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation was
inappropriate and with serious
errors.
APA style was completely
unacceptable.
Written work was generally free of errors in word selection and
use.
Sentence structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation was
adequate.
APA style was acceptable with a
few errors.
Written work has no major errors
in word selection and use.
Sentence structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation was
appropriate.
APA style was acceptable with no to few errors
(0-11 points) (12-15 points) (16-19 points) (20 points)
Structure
Organizational structure and
paragraphing have serious and persistent
errors.
Directions were ignored and
information provided was insufficient to meet assignment
guidelines.
Written work inadequate for college-level
work.
Paragraphing and transitions are inadequate.
Inappropriate
guidelines outlined for
paper were not met with several problems (see
directions).
Written work is clear and
adequate college- level work.
Paragraphing and
transitions are adequate.
Appropriate guidelines
outlined for paper were met with a
few noted problems (see
directions).
Written work is clear and excellent
college-level work.
Paragraphing and transitions are clear and appropriate.
Appropriate guidelines outlined for
paper were met (see directions).
